Skip to content
Open the review labOpen workspace

FOR RFP AND PROPOSAL TEAMS

Review the evidence. Own the decision.

EvidenceGuard brings RFP requirements, source passages and proposal review decisions into the same conversation. See what supports a finding, which version it belongs to, and what still needs a person to decide.

Explore the storySee how it works
ONE AMENDMENT. ONE QUESTION.All documents and review events are fictional. No upload. No live AI analysis.
Addendum 01ADDENDUM-v1 · Section 1

APPLICABLE SOURCE

Submission deadline

Section 2.1 is replaced as follows: The response must be received by 12:00 noon, America/New_York time, on 12 March 2027.
Original RFP §2.1
10 March 2027
Confirmed amendment
12 March 2027
Read source context

In this fictional story, the reviewer confirmed the amendment’s issuer, relationship and applicability. A filename or newer date alone does not establish authority.

Section reference in the synthetic text. No physical PDF page is claimed.

01 / Source

Start with the applicable source.

An amendment changes the submission deadline. Keep the requirement attached to the document that gives it authority.

Requirement

Check the stated deadline against the confirmed amendment.

The original RFP said 10 March. The confirmed amendment says 12 March.

  • Source-linkedInspect the passage behind a finding.
  • Human in controlYou make the final decision.
  • Version-awareKeep decisions in their original context.

THE METHOD

From source to a decision you can explain.

A focused sequence, not a black box. Know what happened to the document before interpreting the result.

  1. 01

    Start with the right source.

    Use an authorized PDF in the current beta. Keep its identity and version attached to the work.

  2. 02

    Inspect what was processed.

    Verification, scanning and parsing establish a processing result—not that every requirement has been found.

  3. 03

    Follow the evidence.

    The public sample connects a requirement, an observation and its source. Customer-document External AI remains disabled.

  4. 04

    Keep judgment human.

    An authorized reviewer checks the relevant evidence and records a separate decision.

  5. 05

    Recheck what changes.

    A new document or confirmed amendment does not silently inherit an old acceptance.

BUILT AROUND YOUR JUDGMENT

Evidence informs. You decide.

Review the passage, weigh the context, and record your decision. Your judgment remains distinct from the system’s analysis.

  1. 01

    Evidence before answers.

    An exact passage gives you something to verify. Missing evidence stays an open question.

  2. 02

    A decision with an author.

    Accept, edit, or reject a finding. Keep the reviewer and the reasoning connected.

  3. 03

    Context that stays with the work.

    Return to the source, the document version, and the history behind a decision.

Start with an example you can inspect.

Explore the requirement, the passage and the review history before bringing your own documents.

Open the review labOpen workspace